The Weimar Imaginary

A lecture at the Weimar 2020 Symposium 2021.05.13.

Abstract

The “imaginary” has become an important feature of many disciplines. Originating with Lacan and Castoriadis, the imaginary became especially important for cultural studies through the work of Benedict Anderson. Imagined Communities was Anderson’s attempt to explain nationalism’s origins and effects in ways that political theory, be it Marxist or liberal, had failed to do. The “national imaginary” became a durable method of summarizing the various interactions that create national ideologies and memory; “imaginary” by itself has become a handy piece of shorthand for capturing the complexity that attends the collective construction of certain kinds of ideas (for example, “cultural imaginary”).

In this presentation I extend the concept of the imaginary to a discussion of Weimar’s place in our contemporary popular imagination. The argument is that a “Weimar imaginary” now exists which relies on specific cornerstone ideas about the Weimar Republic to construct a popular and widely accepted notion of what Weimar was about. One hundred years on, Weimar has come to mean something; it occupies an immediately recognizable shared central space of signification. Two narratives particularly capable of synthesizing and popularizing a common conception of Weimar will help us comprehend how this works.

Jason Lutes’ long-running and recently concluded graphic novel series Berlin has gained widespread attention as a masterpiece of the form, yet little scholarly attention has been paid to the role its content plays in forming a popular imaginary of the period. The Netflix series Babylon Berlin, created by Tom Tykwer, Achim von Borries and Hendrik Handloetgen, and based on the novels of Volker Kutscher, matches Lutes’ success in slaking the public’s thirst for Weimar neo-noir.

In both narratives, Berlin is the centre around which Weimar revolves, drawing protagonists away from conventional Germany. A city of excess and everything modern, characterized by struggles over politics, morality, art, and crime, Berlin becomes the physical manifestation of the 1920s zeitgeist, thereby incorporating and expressing the Weimar imaginary. Such centralizing imaginings of Weimar culture risk creating homogenizing clichés that will ossify our understanding of the period and its intellectual and cultural variety.

References and Citations

Babylon Berlin. X Filme Creative Pool, 2017-.

Balkenborg, Jens. Babylon Berlin: Tanz auf dem Vulkan | epd Film. https://www.epd-film.de/themen/babylon-berlin-tanz-auf-dem-vulkan.

Benjamin, Walter. Über den Begriff der Geschichte. 1940. https://www.textlog.de/benjamin-begriff-geschichte.html.

Enns, Anthony. “The City as Archive in Jason Lutes’ Berlin.” Comics and the City: Urban Space in Print, Picture and Sequence, edited by Jörn Ahrens and Arno Meteling, Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2010, pp. 45–62.

Etter, Lukas. “‘The “Big Picture” as a Multitude of Fragments: Jason Lutes’s Depiction of Weimar Republic Berlin.’ | Lukas Etter - Academia.Edu.” Transnational Perspectives on Graphic Narratives: Comics at the Crossroads, edited by Shane Denson et al., Bloomsbury, 2013, 229-41.

Hall, Sara F. “Babylon Berlin: Pastiching Weimar Cinema.” Communications, vol. 44, no. 3, De Gruyter, Sept. 2019, pp. 304–22.

Hochmuth, Hanno. “Mythos Babylon Berlin. Weimar in der Populärkultur.” Weimars Wirkung: das Nachleben der ersten deutschen Republik, edited by Hanno Hochmuth et al., Wallenstein Verlag, 2020, pp. 111–25.

Hughes, Sarah. “Life’s No Cabaret: Why Gritty Weimar Noir Babylon Berlin Is Wholly Compelling TV.” The Guardian, 10 Apr. 2020, http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/apr/10/lifes-no-cabaret-why-gritty-weimar-noir-babylon-berlin-is-wholly-compelling-tv.

Kavaloski, Joshua. “The Weimar Republic Redux: Multiperspectival History in Jason Lutes’ Berlin City of Stones.” Teaching Comics and Graphic Narratives: Essays on Theory, Strategy and Practice, McFarland, 2014, pp. 145–60.

Lorah, Michael C. “INTERVIEW: Jason Lutes Talks the Final Days of ‘Berlin.’” CBR, 28 July 2015, https://www.cbr.com/interview-jason-lutes-talks-the-final-days-of-berlin/.

Lutes, Jason. Berlin. Drawn and Quarterly, 2020.

Möller, Christian. “Berlin in vielen Strichen.” Die Zeit, 29 Jan. 2009, https://www.zeit.de/online/2009/06/jason-lutes?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F.

Stanley, Alessandra. “Lotte in Weimar.” The New York Review of Books. www.nybooks.com, 24 May 2018, https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/05/24/babylon-berlin-lotte-weimar/.

Weisbrod, Lars. “How Babylon Berlin Turned 1920s Germany Into a Wild, Historical-Fiction Fantasy.” Vulture, 12 Feb. 2018, https://www.vulture.com/2018/02/babylon-berlin-netflix-tom-tykwer-interview.html.

Previous
Previous

Reconciling with Schlink’s Reader

Next
Next

Populism in 2021 and Beyond